On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:16:13AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:01 AM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Try to clean this up by splitting the immutable fault information out
> > into a new 'struct vm_fault_info' which is embedded in 'struct vm_fault'
> > and will later be made 'const'. The vast majority of this change was
> > performed with a coccinelle patch:
>
> You may have a reason for doing it this way, but my reaction to this
> was: "just make the new embedded struct unnamed".
>
> Then you wouldn't need to do all the automated coccinelle changes.
>
> Is there some reason you didn't do that, or just a "oh, I didn't think of
> it".
I tried that initially, e.g.
struct vm_fault {
const struct {
unsigned long address;
...
};
};
but I found that I had to make all of the members const to get it to work,
at which point the anonymous struct wasn't really adding anything. Did I
just botch the syntax?
Will
