On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:01 AM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Try to clean this up by splitting the immutable fault information out
> into a new 'struct vm_fault_info' which is embedded in 'struct vm_fault'
> and will later be made 'const'. The vast majority of this change was
> performed with a coccinelle patch:
You may have a reason for doing it this way, but my reaction to this
was: "just make the new embedded struct unnamed".
Then you wouldn't need to do all the automated coccinelle changes.
Is there some reason you didn't do that, or just a "oh, I didn't think of it".
Linus
