Re: [patch] memcg: skip scanning active lists based on individual size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:13:34PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Reclaim decides to skip scanning an active list when the corresponding
> > inactive list is above a certain size in comparison to leave the
> > assumed working set alone while there are still enough reclaim
> > candidates around.
> >
> > The memcg implementation of comparing those lists instead reports
> > whether the whole memcg is low on the requested type of inactive
> > pages, considering all nodes and zones.
> >
> > This can lead to an oversized active list not being scanned because of
> > the state of the other lists in the memcg, as well as an active list
> > being scanned while its corresponding inactive list has enough pages.
> >
> > Not only is this wrong, it's also a scalability hazard, because the
> > global memory state over all nodes and zones has to be gathered for
> > each memcg and zone scanned.
> >
> > Make these calculations purely based on the size of the two LRU lists
> > that are actually affected by the outcome of the decision.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>

Thank you.

> I can't understand why memcg is designed for considering all nodes and zones.
> Is it a mistake or on purpose?
> Maybe Kame or Balbir can answer it.
> 
> Anyway, this change does make sense to me.
> 
> Nitpick: Please remove inactive_ratio in Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt.
> I think it would be better to separate it into another patch.

Good catch.

---
Subject: [patch] memcg: skip scanning active lists based on individual fix

Also ditch the documentation note for the removed stats value.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
index 06eb6d9..cc0ebc5 100644
--- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
@@ -418,7 +418,6 @@ total_unevictable	- sum of all children's "unevictable"
 
 # The following additional stats are dependent on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM.
 
-inactive_ratio		- VM internal parameter. (see mm/page_alloc.c)
 recent_rotated_anon	- VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
 recent_rotated_file	- VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
 recent_scanned_anon	- VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]