Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: reorganize internal_get_user_pages_fast()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/27/20 6:15 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:33:01AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Fri 23-10-20 21:44:17, John Hubbard wrote:
On 10/23/20 5:19 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
+	start += (unsigned long)nr_pinned << PAGE_SHIFT;
+	pages += nr_pinned;
+	ret = __gup_longterm_unlocked(start, nr_pages - nr_pinned, gup_flags,
+				      pages);
+	if (ret < 0) {
   		/* Have to be a bit careful with return values */

...and can we move that comment up one level, so that it reads:

	/* Have to be a bit careful with return values */
	if (ret < 0) {
		if (nr_pinned)
			return nr_pinned;
		return ret;
	}
	return ret + nr_pinned;

Thinking about this longer term, it would be nice if the whole gup/pup API
set just stopped pretending that anyone cares about partial success, because
they *don't*. If we had return values of "0 or -ERRNO" throughout, and an
additional set of API wrappers that did some sort of limited retry just like
some of the callers do, that would be a happier story.

Actually there are callers that care about partial success. See e.g.
iov_iter_get_pages() usage in fs/direct_io.c:dio_refill_pages() or
bio_iov_iter_get_pages(). These places handle partial success just fine and
not allowing partial success from GUP could regress things...

I looked through a bunch of call sites, and there are a wack that

So did I! :)

actually do only want a complete return and are carrying a bunch of
code to fix it:

	pvec = kvmalloc_array(npages, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
	if (!pvec)
		return -ENOMEM;

	do {
		unsigned num_pages = npages - pinned;
		uint64_t ptr = userptr->ptr + pinned * PAGE_SIZE;
		struct page **pages = pvec + pinned;

		ret = pin_user_pages_fast(ptr, num_pages,
					  !userptr->ro ? FOLL_WRITE : 0, pages);
		if (ret < 0) {
			unpin_user_pages(pvec, pinned);
			kvfree(pvec);
			return ret;
		}

		pinned += ret;

	} while (pinned < npages);

Is really a lot better if written as:

    	pvec = kvmalloc_array(npages, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
	if (!pvec)
		return -ENOMEM;
	ret = pin_user_pages_fast(userptr->ptr, npages, FOLL_COMPLETE |
	                          (!userptr->ro ? FOLL_WRITE : 0),
				  pvec);
         if (ret) {
               kvfree(pvec);
	      return ret;
         }

(eg FOLL_COMPLETE says to return exactly npages or fail)


Yes, exactly. And if I reverse the polarity (to Christoph's FOLL_PARTIAL, instead
of FOLL_COMPLETE) it's even smaller, slightly. Which is where I am leaning now.



Some code assumes things work that way already anyhow:

	/* Pin user pages for DMA Xfer */
	err = pin_user_pages_unlocked(user_dma.uaddr, user_dma.page_count,
			dma->map, FOLL_FORCE);

	if (user_dma.page_count != err) {
		IVTV_DEBUG_WARN("failed to map user pages, returned %d instead of %d\n",
			   err, user_dma.page_count);
		if (err >= 0) {
			unpin_user_pages(dma->map, err);
			return -EINVAL;
		}
		return err;
	}

Actually I'm quite surprised I didn't find too many missing the tricky
unpin_user_pages() on the error path - eg
videobuf_dma_init_user_locked() is wrong.


Well. That's not accidental. "Some People" (much thanks to Souptick Joarder, btw) have
been fixing up many of those sites, during the pin_user_pages() conversions. Otherwise
you would have found about 10 or 15 more.

I'll fix up that one above (using your Reported-by, I assume), unless someone else is
already taking care of it.


thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux