On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 10:57:35AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> Do we adjust the count twice?
>>>
>>
>> Ah, I got the reason why we need to adjust count for *unplugged* sub-blocks.
>
>Exactly.
>
>>
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
>>>> - page = pfn_to_page(pfn + i);
>>>> - if (WARN_ON(!page_ref_dec_and_test(page)))
>>
>> Another question is when we grab a refcount for the unpluged pages? The one
>> you mentioned in virtio_mem_set_fake_offline().
>
>Yeah, that was confusing on my side. I actually meant
>virtio_mem_fake_offline() - patch #12.
>
>We have a reference on unplugged (fake offline) blocks via
>
>1. memmap initialization, if never online via generic_online_page()
>
>So if we keep pages fake offline when onlining memory, they
>
>a) Have a refcount of 1
>b) Have *not* increased the managed page count
>
>2. alloc_contig_range(), if fake offlined. After we fake-offlined pages
>(e.g., patch #12), such pages
>
>a) Have a refcount of 1
>b) Have *not* increased the managed page count (because we manually
>decreased it)
>
Yep, I got the reason now.
>
>--
>Thanks,
>
>David / dhildenb
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
