Hi Arnd, On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:25:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 4:02 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:01:22 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Are there other changes that depend on this? If not, I would > > > just wait until -rc1 and then either push the branch correctly or > > > rebase the patches on that first, to avoid pushing something that > > > did not see the necessary testing. > > > > If it is useful enough (or important enough), then put in in your > > linux-next included branch, but don't ask Linus to merge it until the > > second week of the merge window ... no worse than some other stuff I > > see :-( > > By itself, it's a nice cleanup, but it doesn't provide any immediate > benefit over the previous state, while potentially introducing a > regression in one of the less tested architectures. OK. > The question to me is really whether Nick has any pending work > that he would like to submit after this branch is merged into > mainline. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpEeeIHTsFxy.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
