Hi Arnd, On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:01:22 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:27 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 00:15:16 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > > It would be nice to be able to modify mmu_context functions or add a > > > hook without updating all architectures, many of which will be no-ops. > > > > > > The motivation for this series is a change to lazy mmu handling, but > > > this series stands on its own as a good cleanup whether or not we end > > > up making that change. > > > > > > [...] > > > > Applied to asm-generic, thanks! > > Hi Nick, > > I just noticed a fatal mistake I made when pushing it to the branch on > kernel.org: I used to have both a 'master' and an 'asm-generic' branch > in asm-generic.git but tried to remove the 'master' one as there is not > really any point in having two. > > Unfortunately I forgot to check which one of the two was part of > linux-next, and it was the other one, so none of the patches I picked > up ever saw any wider testing aside from the 0day bot building it > (successfully). > > Are there other changes that depend on this? If not, I would > just wait until -rc1 and then either push the branch correctly or > rebase the patches on that first, to avoid pushing something that > did not see the necessary testing. If it is useful enough (or important enough), then put in in your linux-next included branch, but don't ask Linus to merge it until the second week of the merge window ... no worse than some other stuff I see :-( -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpqKRBBj4Fpk.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
