Hi Michal, On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:10:45 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon 24-08-20 10:52:02, Qian Cai wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:58:50AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 07:10:27PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > > > > Since readahead page is charged on memcg too, in theory we don't have to > > > > check this exception now. Before safely remove them all, add a warning > > > > for the unexpected !memcg. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > > This will trigger, > > > > Andrew, Stephen, can you drop this series for now? I did manage to trigger this > > warning on all arches, powerpc, x86 and arm64 (below). > > Yes, I do agree. See http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200824151013.GB3415@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx OK, I have removed the following from linux-next for today: c443db77c9f3 ("mm/thp: narrow lru locking") 18bafefba73d ("mm/thp: remove code path which never got into") 5fb6c0683017 ("mm/thp: clean up lru_add_page_tail") 9d1d568727a8 ("mm/thp: move lru_add_page_tail func to huge_memory.c") 47eb331560ff ("mm/memcg: bail out early from swap accounting when memcg is disabled") 4b0d99a64d78 ("mm/memcg: warning on !memcg after readahead page charged") -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp9DPGdUKnrX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
