Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] mm/hugetlb: Small cleanup and improvement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Andrew,

Unless someone objects, can you add patches 1-3 of this series to your tree.
They have been reviewed and are fairly simple cleanups.
-- 
Mike Kravetz

On 7/22/20 8:22 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> v1 is here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200720062623.13135-1-bhe@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Patch 1~3 are small clean up.
> 
> Patch 4 is adding warning message when the number of persistent huge
> pages is not changed to the exact value written to the sysfs or proc
> nr_hugepages file.
> 
> v1->v2:
>   Drop the old patch 1/5 in v1 post, which was thought as typo, while
>   actually another kind of abbreviation.
> 
>   Updated patch log of patch 4 which is rephrased by Mike. And move the
>   added message logging code after the hugetlb_lock dropping, this is
>   suggested by Mike.
> 
> 
> Baoquan He (4):
>   mm/hugetlb.c: make is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned return bool
>   mm/hugetlb.c: Remove the unnecessary non_swap_entry()
>   doc/vm: fix typo in the hugetlb admin documentation
>   mm/hugetl.c: warn out if expected count of huge pages adjustment is
>     not achieved
> 
>  Documentation/admin-guide/mm/hugetlbpage.rst |  2 +-
>  mm/hugetlb.c                                 | 27 +++++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux