On 19.08.20 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 19-08-20 12:11:50, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> We make sure that we cannot have any memory holes right at the beginning >> of offline_pages(). We no longer need walk_system_ram_range() and can >> call __offline_isolated_pages() directly. >> >> offlined_pages always corresponds to nr_pages, so we can simplify that. > > I would probably fold this into the previous patch as they are dealing > with the same thing. Will do, shouldn't harm readability. Thanks! --- Thanks, David / dhildenb
