Re: [PATCH v2] mm, oom: make the calculation of oom badness more accurate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:07 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri 10-07-20 14:58:54, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > I will have a closer look. Is the full dmesg available somewhere?
>
> Ups, I have missed this:
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 2dd5a90f2f81..7f01835862f4 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct oom_control *oc)
>  static int oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg)
>  {
>         struct oom_control *oc = arg;
> -       unsigned long points;
> +       long points;
>
>         if (oom_unkillable_task(task))
>                 goto next;
>
> Does it help?
> --

Thanks Michal. This should be the fix.
I did it in our in-house kernel, but when I posted it to upstream I
missed it. That's my fault.


-- 
Thanks
Yafang




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux