Re: [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 13/22] 13: uprobes: Handing int3 and singlestep exception.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 18:30 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> +void uprobe_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +       struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +       struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +       struct mm_struct *mm;
> +       struct uprobe *u = NULL;
> +       unsigned long probept;
> +
> +       utask = current->utask;
> +       mm = current->mm;
> +       if (!utask || utask->state == UTASK_BP_HIT) {
> +               probept = get_uprobe_bkpt_addr(regs);
> +               down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +               vma = find_vma(mm, probept);
> +               if (vma && valid_vma(vma))
> +                       u = find_uprobe(vma->vm_file->f_mapping->host,
> +                                       probept - vma->vm_start +
> +                                       (vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT));
> +               up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +               if (!u)
> +                       goto cleanup_ret;
> +               if (!utask) {
> +                       utask = add_utask();
> +                       if (!utask)
> +                               goto cleanup_ret;

So if we fail to allocate task state,..

> +               }
> +               /* TODO Start queueing signals. */
> +               utask->active_uprobe = u;
> +               handler_chain(u, regs);
> +               utask->state = UTASK_SSTEP;
> +               if (!pre_ssout(u, regs, probept))
> +                       user_enable_single_step(current);
> +               else
> +                       goto cleanup_ret;
> +       } else if (utask->state == UTASK_SSTEP) {
> +               u = utask->active_uprobe;
> +               if (sstep_complete(u, regs)) {
> +                       put_uprobe(u);
> +                       utask->active_uprobe = NULL;
> +                       utask->state = UTASK_RUNNING;
> +                       user_disable_single_step(current);
> +                       xol_free_insn_slot(current);
> +
> +                       /* TODO Stop queueing signals. */
> +               }
> +       }
> +       return;
> +
> +cleanup_ret:
> +       if (u) {
> +               down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +               if (!set_orig_insn(current, u, probept, true))

we try to undo the probe? That doesn't make any sense. I thought you
meant to return to userspace, let it re-take the trap and try again
until you do manage to allocate the user resource.

This behaviour makes probes totally unreliable under memory pressure. 

> +                       atomic_dec(&mm->uprobes_count);
> +               up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +               put_uprobe(u);
> +       } else {
> +       /*TODO Return SIGTRAP signal */
> +       }
> +       if (utask) {
> +               utask->active_uprobe = NULL;
> +               utask->state = UTASK_RUNNING;
> +       }
> +       set_instruction_pointer(regs, probept);
> +} 

Also, there's a scary amount of TODO in there...

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]