> > + */
> > +int uprobe_post_notifier(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > + struct uprobe *uprobe;
> > + struct uprobe_task *utask;
> > +
> > + if (!current->mm || !current->utask || !current->utask->active_uprobe)
> > + /* task is currently not uprobed */
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + utask = current->utask;
> > + uprobe = utask->active_uprobe;
> > + if (!uprobe)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + set_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
> > + return 1;
> > +}
>
> Looks like this can be simplified. If current->utask->active_uprobe is
> non-null then surely the assignment to uprobe will be too?
>
Yes, the two lines where we check for !uprobe and return are redundant
and can be removed. Will be corrected in the next patchset.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>