Re: [PATCH 6/6] sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:17:18AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >  	if (error)
> > -		goto out;
> > +		goto out_free_buf;
> >  
> >  	/* careful: calling conventions are nasty here */
> 
> I think this comment can go now ;-)

It actually long predates the set_fs that was only added for BPF,
and goes back to:

330d57fb98a91 ("[PATCH] Fix sysctl unregistration oops (CVE-2005-2709)")
in the history.git tree.

> > -	} else {
> > -		error = table->proc_handler(table, write, buf, &count, ppos);
> > -	}
> > +	error = table->proc_handler(table, write, kbuf, &count, ppos);
> > +	if (error)
> > +		goto out_free_buf;
> > +
> > +	error = -EFAULT;
> > +	if (copy_to_user(ubuf, kbuf, count))
> > +		goto out_free_buf;
> 
> Can we skip this if !write?  Indeed, don't we have to in case the user has
> passed a pointer to a read-only memory page?

Indeed.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux