On Tuesday 14 June 2011 18:58:35 Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
Is having support for multiple regions a bad thing? Frankly,
removing this support will change code from reading context passed
as argument to code reading context from global variable. Nothing
is gained; functionality is lost.
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:30:07 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
What is bad IMHO is making them the default, which forces the board
code to care about memory management details. I would much prefer
to have contiguous allocation parameters tuned automatically to just
work on most boards before we add ways to do board-specific hacks.
I see those as orthogonal problems. The code can have support for
multiple contexts but by default use a single global context exported
as cma_global variable (or some such).
And I'm not arguing against having âcontiguous allocation parameters
tuned automatically to just work on most boardsâ. I just don't see
the reason to delete functionality that is already there, does not
add much code and can be useful.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@xxxxxxxxxx>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href