Re: [PATCH 08/10] mm: cma: Contiguous Memory Allocator added

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 14 June 2011 18:58:35 Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:03:00 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > For all I know, that is something that is only true for a few very  
> > special Samsung devices,
> 
> Maybe.  I'm just answering your question. :)
> 
> Ah yes, I forgot that separate regions for different purposes could
> decrease fragmentation.

That is indeed a good point, but having a good allocator algorithm
could also solve this. I don't know too much about these allocation
algorithms, but there are probably multiple working approaches to this.

> > I would suggest going forward without having multiple regions:
> 
> Is having support for multiple regions a bad thing?  Frankly,
> removing this support will change code from reading context passed
> as argument to code reading context from global variable.  Nothing
> is gained; functionality is lost.

What is bad IMHO is making them the default, which forces the board
code to care about memory management details. I would much prefer
to have contiguous allocation parameters tuned automatically to just
work on most boards before we add ways to do board-specific hacks.

	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]