On 06/14, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> [2011-06-13 21:57:01]:
>
> > > + mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
> > > + vma_prio_tree_foreach(vma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, 0, 0) {
> >
> > I didn't actually read this patch yet, but this looks suspicious.
> > Why begin == end == 0? Doesn't this mean we are ignoring the mappings
> > with vm_pgoff != 0 ?
> >
> > Perhaps this should be offset >> PAGE_SIZE?
> >
>
> Okay,
> I guess you meant something like this.
>
> vma_prio_tree_foreach(vma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
>
> where pgoff == offset >> PAGE_SIZE
> Right?
Yes, modulo s/PAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SHIFT. But please double check, I can be
easily wrong ;)
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>