On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:41:58 -0700 (PDT) > Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The version I've signed off and am actually testing is below; > > but I've not had enough time to spare on the machine which reproduced > > it before, and another I thought I'd delegate it to last night, > > failed to reproduce without the patch. Try again tonight. > > > > Thought I'd better respond despite inadequate testing, given the flaw > > in the posted patch. Hope the one below is flawless. > > > > Thank you, I'll do test, too. I confirm it fixes the bug: ran ten hours last night, when a couple of tries just before without the patch each failed in ten minutes. (But the load was not testing whether it keeps ownership when it should, I hope you know a quick check on that: our earlier fixes should fail that.) Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>