2011/6/11 Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>>
>> I think this can be a fix.
>
> Sorry, I think not: I've not digested your rationale,
> but three things stand out:
>
> 1. Why has this only just started happening? I may not have run that
> test on 3.0-rc1, but surely I ran it for hours with 2.6.39;
> maybe not with khugepaged, but certainly with ksmd.
>
Not sure. I pointed this just by review because I found "charge" in
khugepaged is out of mmap_sem now.
> 2. Your hunk below:
>> - if (!mm_need_new_owner(mm, p))
>> + if (!mm_need_new_owner(mm, p)) {
>> + rcu_assign_pointer(mm->owner, NULL);
> is now setting mm->owner to NULL at times when we were sure it did not
> need updating before (task is not the owner): you're damaging mm->owner.
>
Ah, yes. It's my mistake.
> 3. There's a patch from Andrea in 3.0-rc1 which looks very likely to be
> relevant, 692e0b35427a "mm: thp: optimize memcg charge in khugepaged".
> I'll try reproducing without that tonight (I crashed in 20 minutes
> this morning, so it's not too hard).
>
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href