Re: [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 0/22] 0: Uprobes patchset with perf probe support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-06-09 20:42:24]:

> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 18:28 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > - Breakpoint handling should co-exist with singlestep/blockstep from
> >   another tracer/debugger.

We can remove this now.
Previous to this patchset the post notifier would run in interrupt
context hence we couldnt call user_disable_single_step

However from this patchset, (due to changes to do away with per task
slot), we run the post notifier in task context. Hence we can now call
user_enable_single_step/user_disable_single_step which does the right
thing. 

Please correct me if I am missing.

> > - Queue and dequeue signals delivered from the singlestep till
> >   completion of postprocessing. 
> 

I am working towards this.  
> These two are important to sort before we can think of merging this
> right?
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]