Re: [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 0/22] 0: Uprobes patchset with perf probe support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:42:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 18:28 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > - Breakpoint handling should co-exist with singlestep/blockstep from
> >   another tracer/debugger.
> > - Queue and dequeue signals delivered from the singlestep till
> >   completion of postprocessing. 
> 
> These two are important to sort before we can think of merging this
> right?

Yup.

Guess Srikar missed updating this part, but the first of the issues
(sstep/blockstep) is now fixed. Signal queueing is a work-in-progress.

Ananth

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]