On 03/13/20 at 03:56pm, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 12-03-20 22:17:49, Baoquan He wrote: > > This change makes populate_section_memmap()/depopulate_section_memmap > > much simpler. > > Not only and you should make it more explicit. It also tries to allocate > memmaps from the target numa node so this is a functional change. I > would prefer to have that in a separate patch in case we hit some weird > NUMA setups which would choke on memory less nodes and similar horrors. > > > Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I do not see any reason this shouldn't work. Btw. did you get to test > it? Forget replying to this comment. Yes, I have tested it before each post.
