On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > No, in 2.6.39 the irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_double() was guarded under "#ifdef > > CONFIG_CMPXCHG_LOCAL". Now it's not. I suppose we could take the comment > > change in percpu.h for 2.6.39, but it probably doesn't merit churning the > > stable tree. > > Yup. Looks good. Christoph? Ok if we do not mind the packing density to be not that tight anymore. Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>