Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Memory Tiering discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 4:05 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 1/28/20 11:50 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
> > So I would like to discuss how we should move forward, what pieces we
> > still miss, what we can combine, etc.
>
> Thanks for proposing this!
>
> In addition to what you've mentioned, I'd really like to close in on
> what folks think the first set of patches we _merge_ would look like.
> More features than what we've got in the two sets?  Less?

Good point. We'd better figure out the minimal viable set.

>
> I'd also like to have to rehash a few discussions we've had inside
> Intel.  For instance, migrating (demoting) a page cache page is more

That would be definitely useful.

> expensive than just discarding at reclaim time.  But, it might be
> expensive to recreate that page later if we do discard it.  There
> doesn't seem to be a single, obviously "right" answer.

I agree, so my patchset just deals with anonymous pages. Page cache
seems more tricky.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux