On Sun, 22 May 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Would it be better to make i915 and ttm call shmem_read_cache_page() > > directly? Perhaps removing the then unused read_cache_page_gfp(), or > > perhaps not: may still be needed for i915 and ttm on tiny !SHMEM ramfs. > > I would certainly prefer the "make i915 and ttm call > shmem_read_cache_page directly" approach over putting some nasty hack > in __read_cache_page. Thank you: I'll go that way. Hugh