On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 12:00 PM Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:51:57AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > > > Yeah, PF_MEMALLOC is likely the better condition to check here as we > > > primarily want to know whether %current might be recursing and that > > > should be indicated reliably with PF_MEMALLOC. Wanna prep a patch for > > > it? > > > > Sure, I will keep your commit message and authorship (if you are ok with it). > > I think the patch already got merged, so it may be easier to do an > incremental one. Oh ok, I will send the incremental one once I have this patch in the mm tree. > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun
