Hello, On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:30:57AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > Basically what I wanted to say that MM treats PF_MEMALLOC as the > reclaim context while __GFP_MEMALLOC just tells to give access to the > reserves. As gfpflags_allow_blocking() can be used beyond net > subsystem, my only concern is its potential usage under PF_MEMALLOC > context but without __GFP_MEMALLOC. Yeah, PF_MEMALLOC is likely the better condition to check here as we primarily want to know whether %current might be recursing and that should be indicated reliably with PF_MEMALLOC. Wanna prep a patch for it? Thanks. -- tejun
