Re: [Question] Is there race between swapoff and swapout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chen Wandun <chenwandun@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I analysied the code about swapoff and swapout, and I suspected there may be a race.
> The kernel version is 4.14 stable.
>
> CPU0						CPU1
> swapoff						swap out
> 						add_to_swap
> 							get_swap_page
> 	......							get_swap_pages						
> 									spin_lock(&swap_avail_lock)
> 									get swap_info_struct
> 									spin_unlock(&swap_avail_lock)		
> 	spin_lock(&swap_avail_lock)									
> 	__def_from_avail_list(swap_info_struct)								
>     	spin_unlock(&swap_avail_lock)					......	
> 	try_to_unuse  // unuse all slot
> 									/* get a free slot from swap_info_struct,
> 									 * and write data to slot later
> 									 */	
> 									scan_swap_map_slots
> 	free swap_info_struct
> 	.......
>
> 	
> If CPU1 get the swap_info_struct first, then CPU0 delete it from list and
> unuse all slot in swap_info_struct, before CPU0 free swap_info_struct CPU1
> call scan_swap_map_slots to alloc a free slot.
>
> I am not sure the analysis above is correct,
> Please let me know if there is any mistake

SWP_WRITEOK will be cleared during swapoff, and it is checked during
swap slots allocation.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> Thanks
> ChenWandun




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux