Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/vmalloc: respect passed gfp_mask when do preloading

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > 
> > > This is explaining what but it doesn't say why. I would go with
> > > "
> > > Allocation functions should comply with the given gfp_mask as much as
> > > possible. The preallocation code in alloc_vmap_area doesn't follow that
> > > pattern and it is using a hardcoded GFP_KERNEL. Although this doesn't
> > > really make much difference because vmalloc is not GFP_NOWAIT compliant
> > > in general (e.g. page table allocations are GFP_KERNEL) there is no
> > > reason to spread that bad habit and it is good to fix the antipattern.
> > > "
> > I can go with that, agree. I am not sure if i need to update the patch
> > and send v4. Or maybe Andrew can directly update it in his tree.
> > 
> > Andrew, should i send or can update?
> 
> I updated the changelog with Michal's words prior to committing.  You
> were cc'ed :)
> 
Ah, i saw the email stating that the patch has been added to the "mm"
tree, but i did not check the commit message. Now i see everything is
sorted out :)

Thank you!

--
Vlad Rezki




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux