On 2019-10-07 10:30:37 [+0200], Daniel Wagner wrote: > Hi, Hi Daniel, > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 06:30:42PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 2019-10-04 18:20:41 [+0200], Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > If we have migrate_disable/enable, then, i think preempt_enable/disable > > > should be replaced by it and not the way how it has been proposed > > > in the patch. > > > > I don't think this patch is appropriate for upstream. > > Yes, I agree. The discussion made this clear, this is only for -rt > trees. Initially I though this should be in mainline too. Sorry, this was _before_ Uladzislau pointed out that you *just* moved the lock that was there from the beginning. I missed that while looking over the patch. Based on that I don't think that this patch is not appropriate for upstream. > Thanks, > Daniel Sebastian
