Hi, On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 06:30:42PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2019-10-04 18:20:41 [+0200], Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > If we have migrate_disable/enable, then, i think preempt_enable/disable > > should be replaced by it and not the way how it has been proposed > > in the patch. > > I don't think this patch is appropriate for upstream. Yes, I agree. The discussion made this clear, this is only for -rt trees. Initially I though this should be in mainline too. Thanks, Daniel
