Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, oom: disable dump_tasks by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 06-09-19 22:41:39, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2019/09/06 22:08, Qian Cai wrote:
> > Yes, mlocked is troublesome. I have other incidents where crond and systemd-
> > udevd were killed by mistake,
> 
> Yes. How to mitigate this regression is a controversial topic.
> Michal thinks that we should make mlocked pages reclaimable, but
> we haven't reached there. I think that we can monitor whether
> counters decay over time (with timeout), but Michal refuses any
> timeout based approach. We are deadlocked there.

There is really nothing controversial here. It just needs somebody to do
the actual work. Besides that I haven't seen any real workload to mlock
so much memory that there won't be anything reapable. LTP oom test
simply doesn't represent any real world workload. So while not optimal
I do not really think this is something to lose sleep over.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux