Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, oom: disable dump_tasks by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 22:41 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2019/09/06 22:08, Qian Cai wrote:
> > Yes, mlocked is troublesome. I have other incidents where crond and systemd-
> > udevd were killed by mistake,
> 
> Yes. How to mitigate this regression is a controversial topic.
> Michal thinks that we should make mlocked pages reclaimable, but
> we haven't reached there. I think that we can monitor whether
> counters decay over time (with timeout), but Michal refuses any
> timeout based approach. We are deadlocked there.
> 
> >                               and it even tried to kill kworker/0.
> 
> No. The OOM killer never tries to kill kernel threads like kworker/0.

I meant,

[40040.401575] kworker/0:1 invoked oom-killer:
gfp_mask=0x40cc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP), order=2, oom_score_adj=0

> 
> > 
> > https://cailca.github.io/files/dmesg.txt
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux