> From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> dde79e005a769 added a regression that the memory cgroup data structures
> all end up in node 0 because the first attempt at allocating them
> would not pass in a node hint. Since the initialization runs on CPU #0
> it would all end up node 0. This is a problem on large memory systems,
> where node 0 would lose a lot of memory.
>
> Change the alloc_pages_exact to alloc_pages_exact_node. This will
> still fall back to other nodes if not enough memory is available.
>
> [RED-PEN: right now it would fall back first before trying
> vmalloc_node. Probably not the best strategy ... But I left it like
> that for now.]
>
> v4: Remove debugging code.
> v3: Really call the correct function now. Thanks for everyone who commented.
> Reported-by: Doug Nelson
> Cc: rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx
> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/page_cgroup.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_cgroup.c b/mm/page_cgroup.c
> index 9905501..2daadc3 100644
> --- a/mm/page_cgroup.c
> +++ b/mm/page_cgroup.c
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static void *__init_refok alloc_page_cgroup(size_t size, int nid)
> {
> void *addr = NULL;
>
> - addr = alloc_pages_exact(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> + addr = alloc_pages_exact_nid(nid, size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> if (addr)
> return addr;
I guess every developers dislike dis quirk name. but I have no idea another
naming.
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>