On Wed 04-05-11 12:55:19, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > >> Ah, right. So, do you have an alternative idea? > > > > Why cannot we just keep the global reclaim semantic and make it free > > memory (hard_limit - usage_in_bytes) based with low limit as the trigger > > for reclaiming? > > Because it's not free memory. In some sense it is because it defines the available memory for a group. > the cgroup doesn't reach a limit. but.... Same way how we do not get down to no free memory (due to reserves etc.). Or am I missing something. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>