Re: [PATCH 1/7] memcg: add high/low watermark to res_counter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Ah, right. So, do you have an alternative idea?
>
> Why cannot we just keep the global reclaim semantic and make it free
> memory (hard_limit - usage_in_bytes) based with low limit as the trigger
> for reclaiming?

Because it's not free memory. the cgroup doesn't reach a limit. but....

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]