On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 06:06:14PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > The x86 version of get_user_pages_fast() relies on disabled interrupts to > synchronize gup_pte_range() between gup_get_pte(ptep); and get_page() against > a parallel munmap. The munmap side nulls the pte, then flushes TLBs, then > releases the page. As TLB flush is done synchronously via IPI disabling > interrupts blocks the page release, and get_page(), which assumes existing > reference on page, is thus safe. > However when TLB flush is done by a hypercall, e.g. in a Xen PV guest, there is > no blocking thanks to disabled interrupts, and get_page() can succeed on a page > that was already freed or even reused. > > We have recently seen this happen with our 4.4 and 4.12 based kernels, with > userspace (java) that exits a thread, where mm_release() performs a futex_wake() > on tsk->clear_child_tid, and another thread in parallel unmaps the page where > tsk->clear_child_tid points to. The spurious get_page() succeeds, but futex code > immediately releases the page again, while it's already on a freelist. Symptoms > include a bad page state warning, general protection faults acessing a poisoned > list prev/next pointer in the freelist, or free page pcplists of two cpus joined > together in a single list. Oscar has also reproduced this scenario, with a > patch inserting delays before the get_page() to make the race window larger. > > Fix this by removing the dependency on TLB flush interrupts the same way as the > generic get_user_pages_fast() code by using page_cache_add_speculative() and > revalidating the PTE contents after pinning the page. Mainline is safe since > 4.13 where the x86 gup code was removed in favor of the common code. Accessing > the page table itself safely also relies on disabled interrupts and TLB flush > IPIs that don't happen with hypercalls, which was acknowledged in commit > 9e52fc2b50de ("x86/mm: Enable RCU based page table freeing > (CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE=y)"). That commit with follups should also be > backported for full safety, although our reproducer didn't hit a problem > without that backport. > > Reproduced-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Hi, I'm sending this stable-only patch for consideration because it's probably > unrealistic to backport the 4.13 switch to generic GUP. I can look at 4.4 and > 3.16 if accepted. The RCU page table freeing could be also considered. > Note the patch also includes page refcount protection. I found out that > 8fde12ca79af ("mm: prevent get_user_pages() from overflowing page refcount") > backport to 4.9 missed the arch-specific gup implementations: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6650323f-dbc9-f069-000b-f6b0f941a065@xxxxxxx/ This looks sane to me, thank you for the backport. I've queued it up now, and if anyone has any objections, please let me know. thanks, greg k-h