2011/5/3 Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:14 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro > <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:35:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: >>> >>> > Do you see my old patch? The patch want't incomplet but it's not bad for showing an idea. >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> typo : wasn't complete >> >> I think your idea is eligible. Wu's approach may increase throughput but > > Yes. it doesn't change many subtle things and make much fair but the > Wu's concern is order-0 pages with __GFP_NORETRY. By his experiment, > my patch doesn't help much his concern. > The problem I have is I don't have any infrastructure for reproducing > his experiment. :( > >> may decrease latency. So, do you have a plan to finish the work? > > I want it but the day would be after finishing inorder-putback series. :) > Maybe you have a environment(8core system). If you want it, go ahead. :) Hahaha, no. I lost such ia64 box by physical crash. ;-) I haven't reproduce his issue yet too. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href