On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:14 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:35:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: >> >> > Do you see my old patch? The patch want't incomplet but it's not bad for showing an idea. >> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â typo : wasn't complete > > I think your idea is eligible. Wu's approach may increase throughput but Yes. it doesn't change many subtle things and make much fair but the Wu's concern is order-0 pages with __GFP_NORETRY. By his experiment, my patch doesn't help much his concern. The problem I have is I don't have any infrastructure for reproducing his experiment. :( > may decrease latency. So, do you have a plan to finish the work? I want it but the day would be after finishing inorder-putback series. :) Maybe you have a environment(8core system). If you want it, go ahead. :) Thanks, KOSAKI. -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href