Re: [PATCH] percpu: preemptless __per_cpu_counter_add

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 28 avril 2011 Ã 11:52 -0500, Christoph Lameter a Ãcrit :

> I can still add (batch - 1) without causing the seqcount to be
> incremented.

It always had been like that, from the very beginning.

Point was trying to remove the lock, and Tejun said it was going to
increase fuzzyness.

I said : Readers should specify what max fuzzyness they allow.

Most users dont care at all, but we can provide an API.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]