Re: [PATCH 0/7] memcg background reclaim , yet another one.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:34 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:08:38 -0700
> Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:47 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <
>> kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > BTW, I think it's better to avoid the watermark reclaim work as kswapd.
>> > It's confusing because we've talked about global reclaim at LSF.
>> >
>>
>> Can you clarify that?
>>
>
> Maybe I should write "it's better to avoid calling watermark work as kswapd"
>
> Many guys talk about soft-limit and removing LRU at talking about kswapd or
> bacground reclaim ;)

Ok, thanks :)

--Ying
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]