Re: [PATCH 0/7] memcg background reclaim , yet another one.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:25:29 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> 2) == hard limit 500M/ hi_watermark = 400M ==
> [root@rhel6-test hilow]# time cp ./tmpfile xxx
> 
> real    0m6.421s
> user    0m0.059s
> sys     0m2.707s
> 

When doing this, we see usage changes as
(sec) (bytes)
   0: 401408        <== cp start
   1: 98603008
   2: 262705152
   3: 433491968     <== wmark reclaim triggerd.
   4: 486502400
   5: 507748352
   6: 524189696     <== cp ends (and hit limits)
   7: 501231616
   8: 499511296
   9: 477118464
  10: 417980416     <== usage goes below watermark.
  11: 417980416
 .....

If we have dirty_ratio, this result will be some different.
(and flusher thread will work sooner...)


Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]