On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 20:00 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi James, > > On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 08:49 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > I'm OK with this Kconfig patch. Can someone send a proper patch with > > > signoffs and such? Do we want to tag this for -stable too? > > > > I already did here: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=130324857801976 > > > > I got the wrong linux-mm email address, though (I thought you were on > > vger). > > Grr, it's a SLUB patch and you didn't CC any of the maintainers! If that > was an attempt to sneak it past me, that's not cool. And if you left it > out by mistake, that's not cool either! No, christoph was directly on the cc ... although I didn't realise there were more slub maintainers. > > I've got a parisc specific patch already for this (also for stable), so > > I can just queue this alongside if everyone's OK with that? > > Feel free, I'm not subscribed to linux-arch so I don't have the patch in > my inbox at all: > > Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> Will do, thanks. James -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>