On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 6:03 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:57:42 -0700Seems getting better. But some comments, below.
Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is the main loop of per-memcg background reclaim which is implemented in
> function balance_mem_cgroup_pgdat().
>
> The function performs a priority loop similar to global reclaim. During each
> iteration it invokes balance_pgdat_node() for all nodes on the system, which
> is another new function performs background reclaim per node. After reclaiming
> each node, it checks mem_cgroup_watermark_ok() and breaks the priority loop if
> it returns true.
>
shrink_memcg_node() instead of balance_pgdat_node() ?
> changelog v6..v5:
> 1. add mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages()
> 2. fix some comment style.
>
> changelog v5..v4:
> 1. remove duplicate check on nodes_empty()
> 2. add logic to check if the per-memcg lru is empty on the zone.
>
> changelog v4..v3:
> 1. split the select_victim_node and zone_unreclaimable to a seperate patches
> 2. remove the logic tries to do zone balancing.
>
> changelog v3..v2:
> 1. change mz->all_unreclaimable to be boolean.
> 2. define ZONE_RECLAIMABLE_RATE macro shared by zone and per-memcg reclaim.
> 3. some more clean-up.
>
> changelog v2..v1:
> 1. move the per-memcg per-zone clear_unreclaimable into uncharge stage.
> 2. shared the kswapd_run/kswapd_stop for per-memcg and global background
> reclaim.
> 3. name the per-memcg memcg as "memcg-id" (css->id). And the global kswapd
> keeps the same name.
> 4. fix a race on kswapd_stop while the per-memcg-per-zone info could be accessed
> after freeing.
> 5. add the fairness in zonelist where memcg remember the last zone reclaimed
> from.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 9 +++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 18 +++++
> mm/vmscan.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index d4ff7f2..a4747b0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> */
> int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> +unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + struct zone *zone);
> unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> struct zone *zone,
> enum lru_list lru);
> @@ -311,6 +313,13 @@ mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> }
>
> static inline unsigned long
> +mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + struct zone *zone)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long
> mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone,
> enum lru_list lru)
> {
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 06fddd2..7490147 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1097,6 +1097,24 @@ int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> return (active > inactive);
> }
>
> +unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + struct zone *zone)
> +{
> + int nr;
> + int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> + int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
> +
> + nr = MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
> + MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> +
> + if (nr_swap_pages > 0)
> + nr += MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, NR_ACTIVE_ANON) +
> + MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
> +
> + return nr;
> +}
> +
> unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> struct zone *zone,
> enum lru_list lru)
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 0060d1e..2a5c734 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
>
> #include <linux/swapops.h>
>
> +#include <linux/res_counter.h>
> +
> #include "internal.h"
>
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> @@ -111,6 +113,8 @@ struct scan_control {
> * are scanned.
> */
> nodemask_t *nodemask;
> +
> + int priority;
> };
>
> #define lru_to_page(_head) (list_entry((_head)->prev, struct page, lru))
> @@ -2625,11 +2629,158 @@ out:
> finish_wait(wait_h, &wait);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +/*
> + * The function is used for per-memcg LRU. It scanns all the zones of the
> + * node and returns the nr_scanned and nr_reclaimed.
> + */
> +static void balance_pgdat_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> + struct scan_control *sc)
> +{
I guess the name is misleading.
Here, too. shrink_mem_cgroup() may be straightforward.
> + int i;
> + unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
> + struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont = sc->mem_cgroup;
> + int priority = sc->priority;
> +
> + /*
> + * This dma->highmem order is consistant with global reclaim.
> + * We do this because the page allocator works in the opposite
> + * direction although memcg user pages are mostly allocated at
> + * highmem.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < pgdat->nr_zones; i++) {
> + struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> + unsigned long scan = 0;
> +
> + scan = mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(mem_cont, zone);
> + if (!scan)
> + continue;
> +
> + sc->nr_scanned = 0;
> + shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
> + total_scanned += sc->nr_scanned;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we've done a decent amount of scanning and
> + * the reclaim ratio is low, start doing writepage
> + * even in laptop mode
> + */
> + if (total_scanned > SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * 2 &&
> + total_scanned > sc->nr_reclaimed + sc->nr_reclaimed / 2) {
> + sc->may_writepage = 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + sc->nr_scanned = total_scanned;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Per cgroup background reclaim.
> + * TODO: Take off the order since memcg always do order 0
> + */
> +static unsigned long balance_mem_cgroup_pgdat(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
> + int order)
Even with !laptop_mode, "write_page since the 1st scan" should be avoided.
> +{
> + int i, nid;
> + int start_node;
> + int priority;
> + bool wmark_ok;
> + int loop;
> + pg_data_t *pgdat;
> + nodemask_t do_nodes;
> + unsigned long total_scanned;
> + struct scan_control sc = {
> + .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> + .may_unmap = 1,
> + .may_swap = 1,
> + .nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> + .swappiness = vm_swappiness,
> + .order = order,
> + .mem_cgroup = mem_cont,
> + };
> +
> +loop_again:
> + do_nodes = NODE_MASK_NONE;
> + sc.may_writepage = !laptop_mode;
How about sc.may_writepage = 1 when we do "goto loop_again;" ?
This can be moved out from the loop.
> + sc.nr_reclaimed = 0;
> + total_scanned = 0;
> +
> + for (priority = DEF_PRIORITY; priority >= 0; priority--) {
> + sc.priority = priority;
> + wmark_ok = false;
> + loop = 0;
> +
> + /* The swap token gets in the way of swapout... */
> + if (!priority)
> + disable_swap_token();
> +
> + if (priority == DEF_PRIORITY)
> + do_nodes = node_states[N_ONLINE];
Hmm...let me try a different style.
> +
> + while (1) {
> + nid = mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(mem_cont,
> + &do_nodes);
> +
> + /*
> + * Indicate we have cycled the nodelist once
> + * TODO: we might add MAX_RECLAIM_LOOP for preventing
> + * kswapd burning cpu cycles.
> + */
> + if (loop == 0) {
> + start_node = nid;
> + loop++;
> + } else if (nid == start_node)
> + break;
> +
==
start_node = mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(mem_cont, &do_nodes);
for (nid = start_node;
nid != start_node && !node_empty(do_nodes);
nid = mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(mem_cont, &do_nodes)) {
shrink_memcg_node(NODE_DATA(nid), order, &sc);
total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned;for (i = 0; i < NODE_DATA(nid)->nr_zones; i++) {
if (populated_zone(NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zones + i))
break;
}
if (i == NODE_DATA(nid)->nr_zones)
node_clear(nid, do_nodes);break;
if (mem_cgroup_watermark_ok(mem_cont, CHARGE_WMARK_HIGH))
}
==
In short, I like for() loop rather than while(1) because next calculation and
end condition are clear.
I tried and the logic itself above doesn't work. Basically we need to start with the start_node and then end with the start_node where the for() loop doesn't fullfill that better.
If possible, i would like to keep the existing implementation by giving that it is not impacting the logic as well as the performance. I would like to move on to the next step after the basic stuffs are in. Hopefull that works.
--Ying
Isn't this wrong ? I guess
> + pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> + balance_pgdat_node(pgdat, order, &sc);
> + total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned;
> +
> + for (i = pgdat->nr_zones - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> + struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> +
> + if (!populated_zone(zone))
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (i < 0)
> + node_clear(nid, do_nodes);
if (populated_zone(zone))
break;
is what you want to do.
Thanks,
-Kame
> +> --
> + if (mem_cgroup_watermark_ok(mem_cont,
> + CHARGE_WMARK_HIGH)) {
> + wmark_ok = true;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (nodes_empty(do_nodes)) {
> + wmark_ok = true;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (total_scanned && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
> + congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
> +
> + if (sc.nr_reclaimed >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> + break;
> + }
> +out:
> + if (!wmark_ok) {
> + cond_resched();
> +
> + try_to_freeze();
> +
> + goto loop_again;
> + }
> +
> + return sc.nr_reclaimed;
> +}
> +#else
> static unsigned long balance_mem_cgroup_pgdat(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
> int order)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * The background pageout daemon, started as a kernel thread
> --
> 1.7.3.1
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href="" href="mailto:dont@xxxxxxxxx">dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
>