I am also taking a look at this work now. I will review and test it in the next couple of days. Pasha On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 9:17 AM Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 15:59 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 3:04 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation. > > org> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:38:55 -0700 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@int > > > el.com> wrote: > > > > > > > The memory hotplug section is an arbitrary / convenient unit for > > > > memory > > > > hotplug. 'Section-size' units have bled into the user interface > > > > ('memblock' sysfs) and can not be changed without breaking > > > > existing > > > > userspace. The section-size constraint, while mostly benign for > > > > typical > > > > memory hotplug, has and continues to wreak havoc with 'device- > > > > memory' > > > > use cases, persistent memory (pmem) in particular. Recall that > > > > pmem uses > > > > devm_memremap_pages(), and subsequently arch_add_memory(), to > > > > allocate a > > > > 'struct page' memmap for pmem. However, it does not use the > > > > 'bottom > > > > half' of memory hotplug, i.e. never marks pmem pages online and > > > > never > > > > exposes the userspace memblock interface for pmem. This leaves an > > > > opening to redress the section-size constraint. > > > > > > v6 and we're not showing any review activity. Who would be > > > suitable > > > people to help out here? > > > > There was quite a bit of review of the cover letter from Michal and > > David, but you're right the details not so much as of yet. I'd like > > to > > call out other people where I can reciprocate with some review of my > > own. Oscar's altmap work looks like a good candidate for that. > > Thanks Dan for ccing me. > I will take a look at the patches soon. > > -- > Oscar Salvador > SUSE L3