> On Apr 11, 2019, at 12:40 PM, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You are right. That would make more sense. It has been a while since I > looked into that code and unfortunately I did not save notes. I'll do some > research to come up with an appropriate explanation/comment. I also like the idea of a comment rather than code here. Zero run time impact and more importantly it instantly explains to everyone why this case is different rather than just adding the check for the sake of uniformity.
