> On Apr 4, 2019, at 1:23 AM, Huang Shijie <sjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > + * This function is different from the get_user_pages_unlocked(): > + * The @pages may has different page order with the result > + * got by get_user_pages_unlocked(). > + * I suggest a slight rewrite of the comment, something like: * Note this routine may fill the pages array with entries in a * different order than get_user_pages_unlocked(), which may cause * issues for callers expecting the routines to be equivalent.
