The input parameter 'phys_index' of memory_block_action() is actually
the section number, but not the phys_index of memory_block. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/base/memory.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index cb8347500ce2..184f4f8d1b62 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -231,13 +231,13 @@ static bool pages_correctly_probed(unsigned long start_pfn)
* OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here.
*/
static int
-memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long action, int online_type)
+memory_block_action(unsigned long sec, unsigned long action, int online_type)
{
unsigned long start_pfn;
unsigned long nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION * sections_per_block;
int ret;
- start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index);
+ start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(sec);
switch (action) {
case MEM_ONLINE:
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long action, int online_t
break;
default:
WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%ld, %ld) unknown action: "
- "%ld\n", __func__, phys_index, action, action);
+ "%ld\n", __func__, sec, action, action);
ret = -EINVAL;
}
--
2.17.2
