Re: [PATCH REBASED] mm, memcg: Make scan aggression always exclude protection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roman Gushchin writes:
However, we can race with the emin/elow update and end up with negative scan,
especially if cgroup_size is about the effective protection size

Yeah, it's possible but unlikely, hence the TOCTOU check. :-)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux