Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/umem: minor bug fix and cleanup in error handling paths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/5/19 5:51 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 05:37:18PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
>> On 3/5/19 5:34 PM, John Hubbard wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>>> So release_pages(&local_page_list[j+1], npages - j-1) would be correct.
>>>>
>>>> Someone send a fixup patch please...
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'm on it. Just need to double-check that this is the case. But Jason,
>>> you're confirming it already, so that helps too.
> 
> I didn't look, just assuming Artemy is right since he knows this
> code..
> 

OK. And I've confirmed it, too.

>>> Patch coming shortly.
>>>
>>
>> Jason, btw, do you prefer a patch that fixes the previous one, or a new 
>> patch that stands alone? (I'm not sure how this tree is maintained, exactly.)
> 
> It has past the point when I should apply a fixup, rdma is general has
> about an approximately 1 day period after the 'thanks applied' message
> where rebase is possible
> 
> Otherwise the tree is strictly no rebase
> 
> Jason
> 

Got it, patch is posted now.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux